<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>▓▒░ TORLEY ░▒▓  - Latest Comments in Soundsnap rocks; what are your fave sound search sites?</title><link>http://torley.disqus.com/</link><description>I amplify your awesome.</description><atom:link href="https://torley.disqus.com/soundsnap_rocks_what_are_your_fave_sound_search_sites/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sun, 25 May 2008 09:28:51 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Soundsnap rocks; what are your fave sound search sites?</title><link>http://torley.com/soundsnap-rocks-what-are-your-fave-sound-search-sites#comment-1873863</link><description>&lt;p&gt;@Ordinal: I like the initial simplicity of Creative Commons; it's definitely appealing to those who want to take action and use media without worrying about the consequences of misunderstanding.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I used to buy some stock sound sample CDs, but found them kind of wasteful after I chose only to use a few clips out of the 100s (or 1000s) on a disc. I like paying for what I actually use. But, in that "grab bag" dept., I haven't found a better deal than this: &lt;a href="http://www.masterbits.de/mp1_e.htm" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.masterbits.de/mp1_e.htm"&gt;http://www.masterbits.de/mp...&lt;/a&gt; It's mainly for music production but has lots of weird sounds, including one-shot percussives, that can be used elsewhere. It's somewhat dated now and hasn't been updated in a stretch of years.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;@Dedric: Nice audio manipulation! I sometimes think, "What would Ben Burtt do?" and he's had so many remarkable insights in sound design.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Torley</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 25 May 2008 09:28:51 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Soundsnap rocks; what are your fave sound search sites?</title><link>http://torley.com/soundsnap-rocks-what-are-your-fave-sound-search-sites#comment-1873862</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I read your post the other day and just recently had a need to find a sound for a client. I checked out soundsnap and found a sound to start off with. I love the licensing here. Optional/Recommended attribution, and free to use however you like as long as you don't hand out the original sound commercially on its own, in a collection of sounds, or without transformation. I ended up altering the pitch of a bicycle bell to be lower so that it resembled a trolley sound. Awesome!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dedric Mauriac</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 24 May 2008 03:24:40 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Soundsnap rocks; what are your fave sound search sites?</title><link>http://torley.com/soundsnap-rocks-what-are-your-fave-sound-search-sites#comment-1873864</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Soundsnap is certainly the place to which I go first. Apart from the convenience of the interface, it has a simple and easily understandable licencing system: "it's all free, use it how you like".&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Soundsnap also absolutely excels in providing bleeps, buzzes, twings and electronic noises in general.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I do use Freesound, and have indeed contributed to it, but I confess that I do not think I properly understand the ramifications of the Sampling Plus licence or whatever it is called, and this worries me. Still - it is better for detailed source recordings I would say, particularly those of an obscure mechanical nature, and the quality is higher.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;SoundDogs is very much aimed at the commercial market, and while it has a wide selection of stuff, the costs of the proper quality files are prohibitive for the average SL developer. I would rather obtain something _close_ to the target for free, and edit and blend it with Audacity or some such. I could perhaps see myself using it for a very specific topic where the sound had to be precisely accurate - perhaps a replica machine of some sort.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ordinal</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 18 May 2008 16:59:46 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Soundsnap rocks; what are your fave sound search sites?</title><link>http://torley.com/soundsnap-rocks-what-are-your-fave-sound-search-sites#comment-1873865</link><description>&lt;p&gt;@Ewan: The latter. A lot of the latter.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;@Ann: I'm a big Moby fan. Haven't seen that before, thanks for the tip! He continues to have a distinguished voice in an ocean of nonsensicalness.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;@Dizzy: Some of these sites with a lot of gems, I wish they were easier to search/organize! Looks like the market is wide open for a better sound meta-search that really catches on.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Torley</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 18 May 2008 10:31:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Soundsnap rocks; what are your fave sound search sites?</title><link>http://torley.com/soundsnap-rocks-what-are-your-fave-sound-search-sites#comment-1873861</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Whilst soundsnap is definitely the easiest to use site, the freesound project is awesome, and has a huge array of sound effects :&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://freesound.iua.upf.edu/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://freesound.iua.upf.edu/"&gt;http://freesound.iua.upf.edu/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;also for one off commercially produced and recorded sound effects from libraries I use &lt;a href="http://www.sounddogs.com/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.sounddogs.com/"&gt;http://www.sounddogs.com/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dizzy Banjo</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 17 May 2008 21:47:43 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Soundsnap rocks; what are your fave sound search sites?</title><link>http://torley.com/soundsnap-rocks-what-are-your-fave-sound-search-sites#comment-1873860</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thats supposed to be "like this and mobygratis" but obviously i typo'd. apologies.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ann Otoole</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 17 May 2008 07:40:35 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Soundsnap rocks; what are your fave sound search sites?</title><link>http://torley.com/soundsnap-rocks-what-are-your-fave-sound-search-sites#comment-1873859</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Torley runs on Torley time lol. Creative people always run in a different dimension anyway which is why mundanes always make problems for them.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Nice find Torley! I love using sites like this and &lt;a href="http://www.mobygratis.com/film-music.html" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="mobygratis"&gt; to counter people that swear up and down that all machinma with music must be violating some artist's copyright.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ann Otoole</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 17 May 2008 07:38:11 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Soundsnap rocks; what are your fave sound search sites?</title><link>http://torley.com/soundsnap-rocks-what-are-your-fave-sound-search-sites#comment-1873858</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Just wondering....... do you have like a 40 hour day or do you just do things so fast relative time appears slower?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ewan Mureaux</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 17 May 2008 03:50:48 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>